Blue Star
The center of the Dallas Cowboys universe

Tony Romo By the Numbers: Tracking Each Route in 2012

View Comments (
)
|
Email
|
Print
Tony Romo By the Numbers

Getty Images

Every NFL quarterback has a particular route or two that he most likes to throw. Some passers have rocket arms and excel on deep outs, for example, while others use their accuracy to connect on comebacks and other timing patterns.

In my opinion, Tony Romo is at his best when he does one of two things: get the ball out quickly following a three-step drop or use his magic in the pocket to extend plays and find receivers downfield. To test that theory, I’ve been tracking every route Romo has thrown this season. Here are his numbers: 
  • Angle: 0-for-1
  • Back Shoulder: 1-for-2 for 6 yards
  • Check Down: 6-for-6 for 50 yards
  • Comeback: 6-for-8 for 57 yards
  • Corner: 2-for-3 for 41 yards
  • Curl: 1-for-1 for 7 yards
  • Dig: 6-for-11 for 98 yards, 2 INT
  • Drag: 3-for-3 for 43 yards
  • Five-Yard In: 5-for-6 for 40 yards, 1 TD, 1 INT
  • Flat: 1-for-1 for 16 yards
  • Go: 1-for-7 for 34 yards, 1 TD, 1 INT
  • Hitch: 14-for-18 for 123 yards, 1 INT
  • Hitch-and-Go: 2-for-2 for 62 yards, 2 TD
  • Out: 8-for-13 for 65 yards, 1 INT
  • Out-and-Up: 0-for-1
  • Post: 5-for-9 for 125 yards, 1 INT
  • Screen: 6-for-7 for 40 yards
  • Seam: 1-for-4 for 18 yards
  • Slant: 16-for-24 for 189 yards
  • Swing: 4-for-5 for 6 yards
  • Wheel: 0-for-1
You can see that, with the exception of a few routes such as hitches and slants, Romo hasn’t posted a huge number of throws on any particular route. When we see that he’s 1-for-4 for 18 yards on seam routes, for example, it’s difficult to tell if he really struggles with that route or he’s simply been unlucky this year.
 
Thus, I’ve broken down the routes into timing and non-timing patterns. The timing patterns include both in and out-breaking routes on which Romo needs to get the ball out at a specific time. Digs, corners, posts, and outs are examples of timing patterns. On such routes, Romo is 42-for-66 for 558 yards, one touchdown, and five interceptions—good for a passer rating of 63.8.
 
On all other routes, Romo has completed 43 of 63 attempts for 462 yards, three touchdowns, and one interception—good for a rating of 92.2. Note that not all of Romo’s attempts are accounted for in my sample—I excluded passes he threw away, passes that came on scramble drills, and a few other fluky throws (such as the interception against the Bears that got knocked out of his hands).
 
The question is whether or not Romo’s struggles on timing routes are a “real” thing or simply due to bad luck through only four games. I really think it’s a combination of both. Romo has proven that he excels at extending plays. On his 2012 scrambles, he is 5-for-8 for 54 yards and a touchdown (121.9 passer rating). Still, I think he’s capable of standing in the pocket and delivering strikes, with the majority of his five interceptions on timing routes coming as the result of bad luck. When you hit a guy right in the hands and the ball pops straight up into the air, for example, that isn’t really on you.
 
One thing I’d love to see the Cowboys do in the future is run more double-moves. Romo has thrown only three double-moves all season, completing two for 62 yards and two scores. The reason we don’t see more of them is that Jason Garrett doesn’t trust his pass protection, and rightfully so. With Romo’s ability to improvise in the pocket and find open receivers downfield, however, I think double-moves are worth the risk. 

Jonathan Bales is the founder of The DC Times. He writes for DallasCowboys.com and the New York Times. He's also the author of Fantasy Football for Smart People: How to Dominate Your Draft.


Blue Star Blog: Stay on top of the latest Dallas Cowboys news with NBCDFW.com. Follow NBC DFW on Facebook or have breaking Cowboys news sent directly to your phone with Blue Star SMS alerts. Text "bluestar" to 622339 (NBCDFW) to subscribe, text HELP for more info, and text STOP to end the subscription. Message and data rates may apply. Read more about it here.

 

Leave Comments