Church Gets Supreme Denial

Court won't block release of alleged sexual abuse documents

Updated 10:23 AM CDT, Tue, Oct 6, 2009

TWITTER FACEBOOK

The Supreme Court won’t block the release of documents generated by lawsuits against priests in Connecticut for alleged sexual abuse.

The justices on Monday turned down a request by the Roman Catholic diocese in Bridgeport.

It's unclear when the documents will be released. The judge in the case scheduled a Nov. 9 hearing and asked attorneys from both sides to submit written arguments about how the documents should be made public.

Several newspapers are seeking the release of more than 12,000 pages from 23 lawsuits against six priests.

Diocese officials said the content from those pages has been reported on extensively and said the Supreme Court decision threatens churches’ First Amendment rights and privacy rights for litigants.

The records have been under seal since the diocese settled the cases in 2001. Courts in Connecticut have ruled that the papers should be made public.

"For more than a decade, the Catholic Church in Bridgeport has addressed the issue of clergy sexual abuse compassionately and comprehensively,” diocese officials said in a statement released Monday. "For now, however, the serious threat to the First Amendment rights of all churches and the rightful privacy of all litigants remain in jeopardy because of the decision of the Connecticut Supreme Court. This, indeed, is regrettable." 

In August, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg dealt the church a major blow by ruling that the documents could not remain sealed as the nation's high court decided whether it would review the case.

In September, Justice Antonin Scalia passed the request to the full court, who ruled on it on accepted the request.

Critics have said the move was an attempt to protect former Bishop Edward M. Egan, who moved many pedophile priests around the diocese even after learning about sex abuse allegations, according to the Hartford Courant
 
Nearly two-dozen lawsuits against seven priests in the diocese were settled for an undisclosed amount of money in 2001.

Four newspapers, including the Courant, went to court in 2002 seeking to have the files reopened and to keep them from being destroyed. The Connecticut Supreme Court has ruled twice that the files are public.

First Published: Oct 5, 2009 9:21 AM CDT on NBC Connecticut

TWITTER FACEBOOK

  • 100% thrilled 1
  • 0% furious 0
  • 0% sad 0
  • 0% bored 0
  • 0% intrigued 0
  • 0% laughing 0
processing
      No comments have been posted yet.

      You have 2000 characters left

      processing
      So My City

      You are posting in (change)

      550/550 characters

      (jpg, pngs, or gifs allowed)

      (jpg, pngs, or gifs allowed)
      *Tip: You can also post moments via email or Twitter.

      processing

      View Your Moment in

      Posted by | 1 second ago

      Don't Miss

      business

      Mar 21, 2010

      Some North Texans Bailing on Big Banks

      Some banking customers are opting to say hello to a local option.

      Read It

      politics

      Mar 21, 2010

      Rank-and-File Supplied Crucial Health Care Votes

      Their faces aren’t the ones you see on television or on magazine covers, but rank-and-file House Democrats supplied the crucial votes on the health care overhaul.

      Read It

      breaking

      Mar 21, 2010

      Heavy Rains Swamp Haiti’s Homeless Camps

      One of the heaviest rainfalls since Haiti's Jan. 12 earthquake swamps homeless camps, sweeping screaming residents into eddies of water and flooding latrines.

      Read It
      Loading...
      Birthdate:
      You must be at least 13 to sign up.
      Gender:
      invalid

      By clicking the button below, I accept the terms of use and privacy policy

      Already Signed Up? Login Below.

      processing

      Here's what we're posting:

      *Only used for verification. We do not store your password.
      processing