Government Lawsuit Against Lance Armstrong Can Go Ahead: Judge | NBC 5 Dallas-Fort Worth
National & International News
The day’s top national and international news

Government Lawsuit Against Lance Armstrong Can Go Ahead: Judge

The government is seeking damages nearing $100 million, about three times what USPS paid in sponsorships to Armstrong's team, the U.S. Postal Service Pro Cycling Team

    processing...

    NEWSLETTERS

    Government Lawsuit Against Lance Armstrong Can Go Ahead: Judge
    AP Photo/Marcio Jose Sanchez, File
    In this Feb. 22, 2009, file photo, Lance Armstrong prepares for the final stage of the Tour of California cycling race in Rancho Bernardo, California.

    A federal judge has allowed a civil lawsuit brought by the U.S. government against disgraced former pro cyclist Lance Armstrong to proceed, tossing aside Armstrong's arguments that the case should be dismissed, NBC News reported.

    The Justice Department alleges in the lawsuit, made under the False Claims Act, that Armstrong, a seven-time Tour de France winner, defrauded the government by doping while sponsored by the U.S. Postal Service. The Justice Department declined to comment Tuesday.

    From 2000 to 2004, the Postal Service paid Armstrong's team, the aptly named U.S. Postal Service Pro Cycling Team, a little more than $32 million, most of which went to Armstrong because he was the team's star rider, according to court filings.

    But the government is seeking damages nearing $100 million, about three times what USPS paid in sponsorships to the Postal Service Team during periods that fall within the False Claims Act's statute of limitations.

    Sanders Vs. Reporters Over Latest Fake News Tirade

    [NATL] Sanders Argues With Reporters Over Latest Fake News Tirade

    White House deputy press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders displayed the administrations's antagonism against the media in heated exchanges with members of the White House press corp during the daily press briefing on Tuesday, June 27, 2017. Sanders pointed to a retracted CNN story as basis of the White House's "frustration" and skepticism with ongoing coverage, while one reporter accused the White House of "inflammatory rhetoric."

    (Published Tuesday, June 27, 2017)